Zhao Forrest wrote: > > When running KVM(kvm.rtl) and xen-HVM(xen.um) on the same machine, I > feel that the guest OS on top of KVM is much faster responsive than > the one on top of xen-HVM. > But this test result showed that xen-HVM is more responsive than KVM. > Weird. I onced tried KVM-36 and xen-3.0.1 and got such impression. >
KVM certainly has an edge in latency because there are fewer layers and schedulers involved. Regarding throughput, the numbers for kvm.rtl look lower than expected while xen.um's numbers are unrealistically high. The test needs to be done more carefully (using a recent kvm, too). -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
