Hollis Blanchard wrote: > On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 20:40 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: > >> Hollis Blanchard wrote: >> >>> Avi, what do you think about breaking the kvm-userspace repository into >>> separate kvm-qemu, kvmctl, and libkvm repositories? >>> >> Firstly, I think kvmctl and libkvm should stay together. >> > > Why? As far as I can see, there are currently two independent consumers > of libkvm: qemu and kvmctl. At the very least they should live in > separate directories. > >
They're both small, and tied up together. I'd rather support one small package than two small packages. Agree about separate directories. > Also, having libkvm on its own means that only one package has to > include kernel headers and deal with that configure mess. The userspace > apps really have no need for that... > kvmctl is intended to be a small test driver, no more. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
