* Ian Pratt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Sigh, I don't really want to have this fight again.
> >
> > i dont remember us having discussed this before, ever. If there's any
> > "fight" about monotonicity and SMP then it would be a pretty onesided
> > affair, with you being beaten up seriously ;-)
>
> Actually, it is possible, even for NUMA systems with CPUs running off
> completely different oscillators, and in the presence of CPU frequency
> changes, power management, and even in the presence of thermal
> throttling (though the latter introduces temporary inaccuracies it
> doesn't affect monotonicity or rate).
>
> Take a look at the Xen code to see how each physical CPU is
> independently calibrated on an ongoing basis, how movement of VCPUs
> between physical CPUs is tracked, and how shared variables are used to
> ensure montonicity if a guest requires it.
I think that's wishful thinking. Check out:
http://people.redhat.com/mingo/time-warp-test/time-warp-test.c
change TEST_TSC to 0, run it on an SMP guest (on a reasonably fast
machine) and let me know whether you can make SMP guests not come up
with monotonicity violations in the CLOCK tests.
Ingo
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list
kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
