Hollis Blanchard wrote: > On Tue, 2007-10-30 at 22:53 +0100, Carsten Otte wrote: >> Zhang, Xiantao wrote: >>> Basically, It doesn't impact our side. For patch 2/3, we had better find >>> an approach to handle mmio-realted functions, becasue they may exist in >>> most archs. >>> For IA64, if this move happens, we have to duplicate them in IA64 side. >> Thanks for your feedback. This matches Hollis' view, I'll try to >> rework that patch. We're really the only platform without mmio, that's >> a s390 special case. I'll leave it in common and find a way around for >> s390. > > Well, those functions right now are hacks that assume the only in-kernel > device is an APIC. That won't even build for anybody who doesn't have > vcpu->apic... that's why I say go ahead and move them, and we can worry > about it later. Right. Xiantao, does ia64 have an apic? Or do you intend to use the code different from x86?
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
