Carsten Otte wrote: > Hollis Blanchard wrote: >> On Tue, 2007-10-30 at 22:53 +0100, Carsten Otte wrote: >>> Zhang, Xiantao wrote: >>>> Basically, It doesn't impact our side. For patch 2/3, we had >>>> better find an approach to handle mmio-realted functions, becasue >>>> they may exist in most archs. For IA64, if this move happens, we >>>> have to duplicate them in IA64 side. >>> Thanks for your feedback. This matches Hollis' view, I'll try to >>> rework that patch. We're really the only platform without mmio, >>> that's a s390 special case. I'll leave it in common and find a way >>> around for s390. >> >> Well, those functions right now are hacks that assume the only >> in-kernel device is an APIC. That won't even build for anybody who >> doesn't have vcpu->apic... that's why I say go ahead and move them, >> and we can worry about it later. > Right. Xiantao, does ia64 have an apic? Or do you intend to use the > code different from x86?
Yes, IA64 has sapic which has mostly same logic with apic. So, we can reuse all ioapic code belongs to x86. I will find the approach to handle it once IA64 code in. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
