Hollis Blanchard wrote: > These patches are not simple code movement, and I haven't yet tested them so > I'm just putting them out for comment. > > Basically we're expanding the VCPU creation path to add an "arch" layer > between > main.c and svm/vmx.c. Since there is one call in each direction (main.c -> > svm/vmx.c, svm/vmx.c -> main.c) we end up with two new architecture functions > in the middle. > >
The approach looks good. Will apply once they've been run tested and the failure paths reviewed (only gave them a cursory look now). -- Any sufficiently difficult bug is indistinguishable from a feature. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
