Bugs item #1824398, was opened at 2007-11-02 11:50
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=893831&aid=1824398&group_id=180599

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Wilson (wilsone)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: poor/weird performance in sandra (kvm50/acpi/windows)

Initial Comment:
CPU Model: Intel Core 2 Duo Q6600
KVM Version: KVM-50
Host Kernel: Linux 2.6.23.1 
Arch: X86_64
Guest: 32bit Windows XP Sp2 ACPI HAL
QEMU Command line: qemu-system-x86_64 -hda /common/stor2/wxp32acpi.qcow2 -m 512 
-net nic,model=rtl8139,macaddr=50:17:99:55:4E:90 -net tap & 
no-kvm: vm won't even boot with -no-kvm

Issue: When doing the CPU benchmarks (arithmetic or multimedia), the system 
takes a very long time and gives a dodgy result. This doesn't happen with a 
non-acpi hal vm. 

Sisoft Sandra can be downloaded here:

http://www.sisoftware.co.uk/index.html?dir=dload&location=sware_dl_3264&langx=en&a=


I'm assuming this should be very easy to replicate for anyone running kvm-50 or 
older with the tpr patch and an acpi hal windows.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=893831&aid=1824398&group_id=180599

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list
kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel

Reply via email to