Hollis Blanchard wrote: > Hi Avi, I'm looking at kvm_init() right now. Since everything is driven > by the arch-specific modules (svm.c and vmx.c), I think it would > simplify things to fold all of kvm_init() into what is today called > kvm_init_x86(). > > If that's done, kvm_main.c won't have any "modinit" function, but I > think that would be OK since the init functionality will be executed as > needed by the arch modules. > > Does this make sense? >
Yes, I think it simplifies things. -- Any sufficiently difficult bug is indistinguishable from a feature. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
