On Sun, 2007-11-04 at 09:20 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: > Jerone Young wrote: > > I'll wait awhile before sending another super patch bomb to the list. > > Perhaps I can add these changes afterward if need be. > > > > > > Please address the comments. If there is to be churn, I prefer it to be > out-of-tree. Please verify that the patch set is bisectable. Agreed.
> > Note that it is too finely granular in my opinion. I'll accept it in > the current form however, I don't want churn for churn's sake. Well the reason for it being fine grained was to see which moves people who disagree with. It kind of has pointed that out :-). But yes having 20+ patches churning on the list is a pain for everyone. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
