I agree with the gernal idea of this patch. Just a few minor things to
pick on:
Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/kvm/kvm.h b/drivers/kvm/kvm.h
> index 4b2421a..33b4629 100644
> --- a/drivers/kvm/kvm.h
> +++ b/drivers/kvm/kvm.h
> @@ -494,9 +494,9 @@ void vcpu_load(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> void vcpu_put(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>
>
> -int kvm_init_x86(struct kvm_x86_ops *ops, unsigned int vcpu_size,
> +int kvm_init(struct kvm_x86_ops *ops, unsigned int vcpu_size,
> struct module *module);
> -void kvm_exit_x86(void);
> +void kvm_exit(void);
Renaming this makes sense to me.
> + r = kvm_mmu_module_init();
> + if (r)
> + goto out4;
This should go to kvm_arch_init. We don't want the shaddow-mmu module
on s390.
> + bad_page = alloc_page(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO);
> +
> + if (bad_page == NULL) {
> + r = -ENOMEM;
> + goto out;
> + }
I don't think we need bad_page on s390, maybe I missed something. It's
only useful for mmu code as far as I can tell.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list
kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
