Carsten Otte wrote:
> Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>> For the present discussion, I agree, but in general we should be
>> prepared to accept some no-op callouts.
>>
>
> Oh sure, I don't mind those. We'll have plenty of them, where other
> architectures will need to take action and s390 won't. It's just that
> in the current location, the common code would do
>
> common_func() {
> loop {
> arch_callback();
> }
> }
> And I suggested to make the whole thing a callback.
>
Ah, agreed.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list
kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
