On Thu, 2007-11-15 at 10:34 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: > Jerone Young wrote: > > This is a continuation of a conversation I have been having with Izik > > Eidus on IRC today. > > > > I plan on moving x86 code out of kvm.h and into kvm-x86.h. kvm-x86.h > > would then include kvm.h and would be included by files like svm.c > > instead of kvm.h. > > > > > > Which kvm.h are we talking about? include/linux/kvm.h or drivers/kvm/kvm.h? > > > Izik pointed out a big issue with this approach and that is it breaks > > compatibility with older userspace. We believe that everyone still cares > > that older userspace should be able to compile against a newer kvm > > kernels. Is this true or should we just dump it? > > > > Of course we can't break compatibility without an excellent reason. > > > Assuming this is true, we have come up with an interesting solution to > > the problem. > > > > - creation of new header name "portablekvm.h" (please give a better name > > if you know one). This would be the new place for common code that would > > normally be kvm.h. > > > > - still create header "kvm-x86.h" for x86 code and would include this > > new "portablekvm.h" header. > > > > - keep compatibility with older userspace by taking header "kvm.h" and > > jsut have it include kvm-x86.h & portablekvm.h and have no other code > > (unless it's for compatibility). > > > > What does everyone thing about this ? > > > > > > Have kvm.h include <asm/kvm.h> what you mean by that?
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel