Zhang, Xiantao wrote: > Carsten Otte wrote: > >> Zhang, Xiantao wrote: >> >>> Moving KVM_CHECK_EXTENSION case to arch, since different archs should >>> have different capabilities. >>> >> I believe we want to keep the existence of the ioctl >> KVM_CHECK_EXTENSION common. Just the extension flags should be arch >> specific. This patch has the danger, that we might end up with >> architectures that don't have KVM_CHECK_EXTENSION at all. >> > > How about attached patch? Agree to keep this ioctl in common, and > instead define an arch-specific function in x86. > >
Applied; thanks. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
