Avi Kivity wrote: > Neo Jia wrote: >> On Nov 18, 2007 3:04 AM, Avi Kivity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> Neo Jia wrote: >>> >>>> Another question is about the architecture, I found it seems that the >>>> 32-bit platform is much more stable than 64-bit. Should I switch my >>>> system to 64-bit for later work? >>>> >>>> >>> Where do you get this impression? I do almost all of my development on >>> 64-bit, and I don't recall an issue that was 64-bit host specific. >>> >> >> Sorry about that ... >> >> because I always saw "host 64-bit" in the bug report although maybe >> they are not 64-bit host specific problem. >> > > Yes. Most testing (and production use) is done on 64-bit hosts, since > virtualization is memory-intensive. Also, you can test more types of > guests this way. Almost all virtualization-capable processors are > also 64-bit capable. So, does that mean I need to install a 64-bit host to make the reproduce easier?
Neo > > 32-bit hosts are mostly useful for laptop/desktop use. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
