Neo Jia wrote:
>>>
>>> Do we need to add a "default" in x86 emulator switch statement?
>>>
>>>
>>>       
>> Take a look at the code.  That path is already covered.
>>     
>
> Avi,
>
> I just checkout the latest kvm.git. Please correct me if I am wrong.
>
> I don't see the explicit "default" in swtich (c->b) statement but I
> found a goto writeback.
>   

If the insn decode flag word c->d (derived from opcode_table) is zero, 
we return early.  See the test just after the label 'done_prefixes'.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list
kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel

Reply via email to