Carsten Otte wrote: > Avi Kivity wrote: >> But you do need the vcpu cache, right? > I think about organizing our SIE control blocks in it, just like vmx > and svm do with their hardware structures backing a vcpu state. > They're 512 bytes in size, and need to start on a 512-byte boundary. > Sorry about my previous answer, I was confused by vcpu_cache / > vcpu_decache for x86. It's friday...
Ah, so you even need the alignment (which happen to be exactly the x86 fpu alignment). So we have two archs needing special allocation, and two archs using a common allocator. -- Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future. http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4 _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
