Jeremy Katz wrote: > On Sat, 2007-12-01 at 12:10 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: >> Zhang, Xiantao wrote: >>> I think new archs for kvm doesn't need to care about kvm-abi >>> case in their code, since current abi is bigger than 10. But in >>> current libkvm.c, we can see that many abi-specific code in it. How >>> to handle it ? Can we use __x86__ macro to make it sightless for >>> other archs or other good methods ? >>> >> >> #ifdef is okay for this. Actually we can probably remove abi 10 >> support since the F7 kernel now supports the modern ABI (I don't >> think anybody else uses abi 10, which is pre 2.6.22 when we >> announced ABI compatibility. >> >> Jeremy, is removing abi 10 support fine with you? I note that both >> the kernel supports the new ABI and F7 userspace doesn't require it, >> so >> we're fine on both counts. > > Yeah, that sounds like it should be fine. The updates have been out > for quite a while at this point
Glad to see that. I am working on enabling ia64. If it is removed, it will be cleaner for us. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future. http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4 _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
