On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 20:36 +0100, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
> @@ -2600,8 +2601,8 @@ void cpu_physical_memory_rw(target_phys_addr_t
> addr, uint8_t *buf,
> phys_ram_dirty[addr1 >> TARGET_PAGE_BITS] |=
> (0xff & ~CODE_DIRTY_FLAG);
> }
> -#ifdef __ia64__
> - kvm_sync_icache((unsigned long)ptr, l);
> +#ifdef USE_KVM
> + flush_icache_range((unsigned long)ptr, ((unsigned long)ptr)+l);
> #endif
> }
> } else {
A comment to explain why the icache needs flushing only in the KVM case
would be useful. Other than that I'm fine with it.
Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
Hollis Blanchard
IBM Linux Technology Center
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services
for just about anything Open Source.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace
_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list
kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
