Amit Shah wrote:
> On Thursday 27 December 2007 13:20:06 Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
>   
>>>> It shouldn't have any confilicts, since they belong to different
>>>> archs. Currently, you know source code is placed at
>>>> arch/{$arch}/kvm, and Makefile and Kconfig aslo there.
>>>> So, it doesn't impact any issues, since ia64 and x86_64 are totally
>>>> different archs.  For example, you can define HAS_IO_PORT macro for
>>>> ia64 and x86, but they don't invoke any conficlts.:)
>>>>         
>>> What about files that get shared?
>>>       
>> I think common files shouldn't use KVM_CONFIG_INTEL.
>>     
>
> Even then I'm not sure we should use a common #define within the sources that 
> will apply to two different architectures in different ways under different 
> build environments. Avi, what do you think?
>   

I agree in principle, but I don't see a big hurry to change things.  
Let's get it merged first.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list
kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel

Reply via email to