Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > So the first patch seemed alright (taking into account the comments from > my previous email, that migration should probably be fixed in a separate > patch since its broken already and that its guaranteed that vcpu0 is the > first to hit vcpu_load). >
I really would like not to have this dependency. It's easy to write userspace that doesn't do this and there's no reason not to. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
