Jan Kiszka wrote: > The PIT may not be limited to x86 platforms. So I would propose to make > the setup more generic and flexible. And I would move the code out of > arch/x86, just the speaker support should remain there. > > I'm currently struggling with emulating a proprietary platform that has > (among other specialties...) a different PIT base frequency, and I > already had to patch user space qemu for customizable frequencies. Maybe > this kernel extension is a good chance to generalize the PIT setup, and > I would be happy to contribute to this if there is a consensus. >
Certainly an ioctl() to configure the PIT can be added. I think that we can leave that to a later patch though. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel