Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Do others expect KVM to just cope with the virtual mapping being changed 
> out from underneath of it?
>   

kvm should cope with both malicious guests and malicious (or buggy) host 
userspace.  It's difficuly to analyze, but mmu notifiers might be 
necessary for the latter.

-- 
Any sufficiently difficult bug is indistinguishable from a feature.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list
kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel

Reply via email to