Anthony Liguori wrote: > Do others expect KVM to just cope with the virtual mapping being changed > out from underneath of it? >
kvm should cope with both malicious guests and malicious (or buggy) host userspace. It's difficuly to analyze, but mmu notifiers might be necessary for the latter. -- Any sufficiently difficult bug is indistinguishable from a feature. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel