Yang, Sheng wrote:
> From db6524fb36bbf1f297ae171f18de382c32ed6840 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Sheng Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 08:17:57 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] KVM: VMX: Fix invalid opcode of VPID
>
> Add the missing "memory" in VPID clobber list, otherwise it would cause 
> invalid opcode on host.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sheng Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> index 00a00e4..3d8949a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> @@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ static inline void __invvpid(int ext, u16 vpid, gva_t gva)
>      asm volatile (ASM_VMX_INVVPID
>                 /* CF==1 or ZF==1 --> rc = -1 */
>                 "; ja 1f ; ud2 ; 1:"
> -               : : "a"(&operand), "c"(ext) : "cc");
> +               : : "a"(&operand), "c"(ext) : "cc", "memory");
>  }
>
>  static struct kvm_msr_entry *find_msr_entry(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx, u32 msr)
>   

Ah, yes.  That's my fault -- since invvpid doesn't modify memory, I 
assumed a memory clobber wan't necessary, but it is since otherwise gcc 
doesn't force the operand into memory.  Applied.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel

Reply via email to