Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Tue, 29 Jan 2008, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > >>> + struct mmu_notifier_head mmu_notifier; /* MMU notifier list */ >>> }; >>> >> Not sure why you prefer to waste ram when MMU_NOTIFIER=n, this is a >> regression (a minor one though). >> > > Andrew does not like #ifdefs and it makes it possible to verify calling > conventions if !CONFIG_MMU_NOTIFIER. > >
You could define mmu_notifier_head as an empty struct in that case. -- Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
