Anthony Liguori wrote: > This patch attempts to clean up the interactions between KVM and > QEMU. Sorry > for such a big patch, but I don't think there's a better way to > approach this > such that it's still bisect friendly. I think this is most of what's > needed to > get basic KVM support into QEMU though. > > Right now, there's a mix of #ifdef USE_KVM, if (kvm_allowed), and > various > extern declarations. It's all pretty fugly and there's a lot of > mistakes due > to it. > > The following patch eliminates almost all uses of #ifdef USE_KVM by > introducing > a kvm_enabled() macro. If USE_KVM is set, this macro evaluates to > kvm_allowed. > If USE_KVM isn't set, the macro evaluates to 0. > > Since GCC eliminates if (0) blocks, this is just as good as using > #ifdef. By > making sure that we never call into libkvm directly from QEMU, we can > also just > not link qemu-kvm when USE_KVM isn't set instead of having the entire > file > wrapped in a USE_KVM. > > We also change the --enable-kvm configure option to --disable-kvm > since KVM is > enabled by default. > > I've tested this patch on x86 with 32-bit and 64-bit Linux guests and > a 32-bit > Windows guest. I've also tested with USE_KVM not set. Jerone has > also > verified that it doesn't PPC. My apologies if it breaks ia64 but I > have no > way of testing that.
Hi, Anthony Good patch indeed! I have checked ia64 side, and It shouldn't break ia64. Thanks! Xiantao ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel