On Fri, 1 Feb 2008, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > I appreciate the review! I hope my entirely bug free and > strightforward #v5 will strongly increase the probability of getting > this in sooner than later. If something else it shows the approach I > prefer to cover GRU/KVM 100%, leaving the overkill mutex locking > requirements only to the mmu notifier users that can't deal with the > scalar and finegrined and already-taken/trashed PT lock.
Mutex locking? Could you be more specific? I hope you will continue to do reviews of the other mmu notifier patchset? ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
