Christian Ehrhardt wrote: > This should work for other architectures too. While we need to specify > cpu cores here others might specify something completely different with > the same interface. > So kvm_vcpu_create_type might be misleading while something like > kvm_vcpu_create_info might be more generic. > Just to get some background - do anyone else see the need to specify a > detail on vcpu_create for their implementation in future ? We do. For now, kvm_create_vcpu does create a cpu from a template. However our hardware control block allows to enable/disable various features. I would imagine that future userspace may want something different than the stock default values, and therefore a parameter would make sense for us too.
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
