actually grab and return data, instead of just being two
bogus functions.

Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
 qemu/hw/acpi.c |   36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/qemu/hw/acpi.c b/qemu/hw/acpi.c
index 02f6bab..60d3094 100644
--- a/qemu/hw/acpi.c
+++ b/qemu/hw/acpi.c
@@ -545,6 +545,24 @@ static struct gpe_regs gpe;
 static uint32_t gpe_readb(void *opaque, uint32_t addr)
 {
     uint32_t val = 0;
+    struct gpe_regs *g = opaque;
+    switch (addr) {
+        case 0xafe0:
+            val = g->sts & 0xFF;
+            break;
+        case 0xafe1:
+            val =  (g->sts >> 8) & 0xFF;
+            break;
+        case 0xafe2:
+            val =  g->en & 0xFF;
+            break;
+        case 0xafe3:
+            val =  (g->en >> 8) & 0xFF;
+            break;
+        default:
+            break;
+    }
+
 #if defined(DEBUG)
     printf("gpe read %lx == %lx\n", addr, val);
 #endif
@@ -553,6 +571,24 @@ #endif
 
 static void gpe_writeb(void *opaque, uint32_t addr, uint32_t val)
 {
+    struct gpe_regs *g = opaque;
+    switch (addr) {
+        case 0xafe0:
+            g->sts = (g->sts & ~0xFFFF) | (val & 0xFFFF);
+            break;
+        case 0xafe1:
+            g->sts = (g->sts & 0xFFFF) | (val << 8);
+            break;
+        case 0xafe2:
+            g->en = (g->en & ~0xFFFF) | (val & 0xFFFF);
+            break;
+        case 0xafe3:
+            g->en = (g->en & 0xFFFF) | (val << 8);
+            break;
+        default:
+            break;
+   }
+
 #if defined(DEBUG)
     printf("gpe write %lx <== %d\n", addr, val);
 #endif
-- 
1.4.2


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list
kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel

Reply via email to