On Fri, 7 Mar 2008, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > I didn't look into this but it shows how it would be risky to make > this change in .25. It's a bit strange that the bugcheck triggers
Yes this was never intended for .25. I think we need to split this into a copule of patches. One needs to get rid of the spinlock dropping, then one that deals with the read concurrency issues and finally one that converts the spinlock. Thanks for looking at it. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
