Glauber Costa wrote: >> >> [Once a patchset has been applied and pushed (as seen on >> kvm-commits), I prefer incremental patches] >> > But I think this is a very good case of an exception, since the > applied patches would break bisect. I prefer to hear "damn glommer!" > because of that than "damn glommer!!" because of a broken bisect.
I fold them up before sending to Linus anyway, so upstream bisect continues to work. For kvm.git, it's a choice between rewinding it a bit (which may confuse anyone who pulls) and breaking bisect. -- Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
