david ahern wrote:
> Avi Kivity wrote:
>   
>> It might be difficult for RHEL 4, which is 2.6.5 based IIRC.  If the
>> magic required is more that 500 millithaums, then an independent driver
>> would be better.
>>     
>
> RHEL4 is based on 2.6.9.
>
> What do you mean by "magic required is more that 500 millithaums"?
>   

I believe that was a joke :-)

Right now, we use an awk script to automatically insert a bunch of 
#ifdef COMPAT_xxx into the virtio drivers.  Combined with a special 
include header, this automatically creates a new source tree from the 
upstream bits that can be compiled on many different kernel versions.  
Right now we support roughly 2.6.18-2.6.25.

The question is how far can we push this before it gets ridiculous.  I'd 
like to try going back to 2.6.9.  Posting what you have now would be 
helpful.  If it gets too difficult, we may just have to have independent 
source trees for things like RHEL4.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

> david
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> kvm-devel mailing list
> kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
>   


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list
kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel

Reply via email to