Avi Kivity wrote:
> Carsten Otte wrote:
>>
>> /* for KVM_RUN, returned by mmap(vcpu_fd, offset=0) */
>> struct kvm_run {
>> @@ -138,6 +139,14 @@ struct kvm_run {
>> __u32 is_write;
>> __u32 pad;
>> } tpr_access;
>> + /* KVM_EXIT_S390_SIEIC */
>> + struct {
>> + __u8 icptcode;
>> + __u64 mask; /* psw upper half */
>> + __u64 addr; /* psw lower half */
>> + __u16 ipa;
>> + __u32 ipb;
>> + } s390_sieic;
>> /* Fix the size of the union. */
>> char padding[256];
>> };
>>
>>
>
> Do you support 32-bit userspace on 64-bit kernel? If so, this is likely
> badly aligned.
32bit userspace is not pracitcal, current enterprise distributions
come with 64bit only on s390. Nevertheless, I don't get your point on
allignment. What is the problem caused by the struct, and how can I
solve it?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list
kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
