Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
> +typedef union context {
> + /* 8K size */
> + char dummy[KVM_CONTEXT_SIZE];
> + struct {
> + unsigned long psr;
> + unsigned long pr;
> + unsigned long caller_unat;
> + unsigned long pad;
> + unsigned long gr[32];
> + unsigned long ar[128];
> + unsigned long br[8];
> + unsigned long cr[128];
> + unsigned long rr[8];
> + unsigned long ibr[8];
> + unsigned long dbr[8];
> + unsigned long pkr[8];
> + struct ia64_fpreg fr[128];
> + };
> +} context_t;
This looks ugly to me. I'd rather prefer to have a straight struct
with elements psr...fr[], and cast the pointer to char* when needed.
KVM_CONTEXT_SIZE can be used as parameter to kzalloc() on allocation,
it's too large to be on stack anyway.
> +typedef struct thash_data {
> + union {
> + struct {
> + unsigned long p : 1; /* 0 */
> + unsigned long rv1 : 1; /* 1 */
> + unsigned long ma : 3; /* 2-4 */
> + unsigned long a : 1; /* 5 */
> + unsigned long d : 1; /* 6 */
> + unsigned long pl : 2; /* 7-8 */
> + unsigned long ar : 3; /* 9-11 */
> + unsigned long ppn : 38; /* 12-49 */
> + unsigned long rv2 : 2; /* 50-51 */
> + unsigned long ed : 1; /* 52 */
> + unsigned long ig1 : 11; /* 53-63 */
> + };
> + struct {
> + unsigned long __rv1 : 53; /* 0-52 */
> + unsigned long contiguous : 1; /*53 */
> + unsigned long tc : 1; /* 54 TR or TC */
> + unsigned long cl : 1;
> + /* 55 I side or D side cache line */
> + unsigned long len : 4; /* 56-59 */
> + unsigned long io : 1; /* 60 entry is for io or
> not */
> + unsigned long nomap : 1;
> + /* 61 entry cann't be inserted into machine
> TLB.*/
> + unsigned long checked : 1;
> + /* 62 for VTLB/VHPT sanity check */
> + unsigned long invalid : 1;
> + /* 63 invalid entry */
> + };
> + unsigned long page_flags;
> + }; /* same for VHPT and TLB */
> +
> + union {
> + struct {
> + unsigned long rv3 : 2;
> + unsigned long ps : 6;
> + unsigned long key : 24;
> + unsigned long rv4 : 32;
> + };
> + unsigned long itir;
> + };
> + union {
> + struct {
> + unsigned long ig2 : 12;
> + unsigned long vpn : 49;
> + unsigned long vrn : 3;
> + };
> + unsigned long ifa;
> + unsigned long vadr;
> + struct {
> + unsigned long tag : 63;
> + unsigned long ti : 1;
> + };
> + unsigned long etag;
> + };
> + union {
> + struct thash_data *next;
> + unsigned long rid;
> + unsigned long gpaddr;
> + };
> +} thash_data_t;
A matter of taste, but I'd prefer unsigned long mask, and
#define MASK_BIT_FOR_PURPUSE over bitfields. This structure could be
much smaller that way.
> +struct kvm_regs {
> + char *saved_guest;
> + char *saved_stack;
> + struct saved_vpd vpd;
> + /*Arch-regs*/
> + int mp_state;
> + unsigned long vmm_rr;
> + /* TR and TC. */
> + struct thash_data itrs[NITRS];
> + struct thash_data dtrs[NDTRS];
> + /* Bit is set if there is a tr/tc for the region. */
> + unsigned char itr_regions;
> + unsigned char dtr_regions;
> + unsigned char tc_regions;
> +
> + char irq_check;
> + unsigned long saved_itc;
> + unsigned long itc_check;
> + unsigned long timer_check;
> + unsigned long timer_pending;
> + unsigned long last_itc;
> +
> + unsigned long vrr[8];
> + unsigned long ibr[8];
> + unsigned long dbr[8];
> + unsigned long insvc[4]; /* Interrupt in service. */
> + unsigned long xtp;
> +
> + unsigned long metaphysical_rr0; /* from kvm_arch (so is pinned)
> */
> + unsigned long metaphysical_rr4; /* from kvm_arch (so is pinned)
> */
> + unsigned long metaphysical_saved_rr0; /* from kvm_arch
> */
> + unsigned long metaphysical_saved_rr4; /* from kvm_arch
> */
> + unsigned long fp_psr; /*used for lazy float register */
> + unsigned long saved_gp;
> + /*for phycial emulation */
> +};
This looks like it does'nt just have guest register content in it. It
seems to me preferable to have another ioctl different from
KVM_GET_REGS/KVM_SET_REGS to read and set the rest of the content and
seperate it from struct kvm_regs.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace
_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list
kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
