Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
> Carsten Otte wrote:
>> Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
>>> +/* mca_insert_tr
>>> + *
>>> + * Switch rid when TR reload and needed!
>>> + * iord: 1: itr, 2: itr;
>>> + *
>>> +*/
>>> +static void mca_insert_tr(u64 iord)
>>> +{
>>> +
>>> + int i;
>>> + u64 old_rr;
>>> + struct ia64_tr_entry *p;
>>> + unsigned long psr;
>>> + int cpu = smp_processor_id();
>> What if CONFIG_PREEMPT is on, and we're being preempted and scheduled
>> to a different CPU here? Are we running preempt disabled here? If so,
>> the function header should state that this function needs to be called
>> preempt_disabled.
>
> The function insert one TR to local TLB, and doesn't allow preempt
> before and after the call, so the caller should be with preempt_disable
> before calling into this routine.
> Maybe the descripiton of this function should contain "Called with
> preempt disabled!". Does it make sense ?
Yea, I think a comment would help in that case :-).
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace
_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
