* On Wednesday 09 Apr 2008 17:41:10 Glauber Costa wrote: > Amit Shah wrote: > > * On Tuesday 08 April 2008 22:34:36 Glauber Costa wrote: > >> Instead of artificially limiting irq numbers, use arch provided NR_IRQS > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Thanks, applied. > > > > Going forward, we're going to use the in-kernel approach for interrupt > > injection (which already has this change). The irqhook module will stay > > around for testing / debugging purposes (will be used with > > -no-kvm-irqchip). > > > > Amit. > > Is it already in your tree?
Yes, it's in the new tree I just sent the link to. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
