Carsten Otte wrote: > Avi Kivity wrote: >>> @@ -765,6 +766,7 @@ void kvm_vcpu_block(struct kvm_vcpu *vcp >>> >> >> >> This breaks ia64 (and shouldn't s390 use this too?) >>> * We will block until either an interrupt or a signal wakes us up >>> */ >>> while (!kvm_cpu_has_interrupt(vcpu) >>> + && !kvm_cpu_has_pending_timer(vcpu) >>> >> >> I guess the fix is to stub this out for the other archs. > > We don't use that, we have our own implementation of vcpu_block.
Why? -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
