Nguyen Anh Quynh wrote:
> This patch fixes a wrong calculation in the physical address of
> extboot (qemu/hw/extboot.c). Looks like a typo.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nguyen Anh Quynh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>   
> diff --git a/qemu/hw/extboot.c b/qemu/hw/extboot.c
> index 056fb59..0dac34c 100644
> --- a/qemu/hw/extboot.c
> +++ b/qemu/hw/extboot.c
> @@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ static void extboot_write_cmd(void *opaque, uint32_t addr, 
> uint32_t value)
>      get_translated_chs(bs, &cylinders, &heads, &sectors);
>  
>      if (cmd->type == 0x01 || cmd->type == 0x02) {
> -     target_ulong pa = cmd->xfer.segment * 16 + cmd->xfer.segment;
> +     target_ulong pa = cmd->xfer.segment * 16 + cmd->xfer.offset;
>  
>       /* possible buffer overflow */
>       if ((pa + cmd->xfer.nb_sectors * 512) > phys_ram_size)
>   

In practice, this check isn't actually necessary since a guest always 
has at least 1MB of memory.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list
kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel

Reply via email to