Anthony Liguori wrote: > There is a 5th option. Do away with the use of posix aio. We get > absolutely no benefit from it because it's limited to a single thread. > Fabrice has reverted a patch to change that in the past. How about using linux aio for it? It seems much better, because it doesn't use userspace threads but has a direct in-kernel implementation. I've had good performance on zldisk with that, and it's stable.
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
