I believe that's the way to go. If you have spare time on your hands,  
feel free to integrate my multiboot patches as well.

Alex

On Apr 22, 2008, at 11:07 AM, Nguyen Anh Quynh wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I am thinking about comibing this ROM with the extboot. Both two ROM
> are about "booting", so I think that is reasonable. So we will have
> only 1 ROM that supports both external boot and Linux boot.
>
> Is that desirable or not?
>
> Thanks,
> Quynh
>
> On 4/21/08, Nguyen Anh Quynh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hmm, the last patch includes a binary. So please take this patch  
>> instead.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Q
>>
>> # diffstat linuxboot1.diff
>>  Makefile             |   13 ++++-
>>  linuxboot/Makefile   |   40 +++++++++++++++
>>  linuxboot/boot.S     |   54 +++++++++++++++++++++
>>  linuxboot/farvar.h   |  130 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 
>> ++++++++++++
>>  linuxboot/rom.c      |  104 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>
>> linuxboot/signrom.c  |  128 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 
>> ++++++++++
>>  linuxboot/util.h     |   69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  qemu/Makefile        |    3 -
>>  qemu/Makefile.target |    2
>>  qemu/hw/linuxboot.c  |   39 +++++++++++++++
>>  qemu/hw/pc.c         |   22 +++++++-
>>  qemu/hw/pc.h         |    5 +
>>
>> 12 files changed, 600 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 12:33 PM, Nguyen Anh Quynh  
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Forget to say that this patch is against kvm-66.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Q
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Nguyen Anh Quynh  
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> This should be submitted to upstream (but not to kvm-devel list),  
>>>> but
>>>> this is only the test code that I want to quickly send out for
>>>> comments. In case it looks OK, I will send it to upstream later.
>>>>
>>>> Inspired by extboot and conversations with Anthony and HPA, this
>>>> linuxboot option ROM is a simple option ROM that intercepts int19  
>>>> in
>>>> order to execute linux setup code. This approach eliminates the  
>>>> need
>>>> to manipulate the boot sector for this purpose.
>>>>
>>>> To test it, just load linux kernel with your KVM/QEMU image using
>>>> -kernel option in normal way.
>>>>
>>>> I succesfully compiled and tested it with kvm-66 on Ubuntu 7.10,  
>>>> guest
>>>> Ubuntu 8.04.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Quynh
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> # diffstat linuxboot1.diff
>>>>  Makefile             |   13 ++++-
>>>>  linuxboot/Makefile   |   40 +++++++++++++++
>>>>  linuxboot/boot.S     |   54 +++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>  linuxboot/farvar.h   |  130 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 
>>>> ++++++++++++++
>>>>  linuxboot/rom.c      |  104 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 
>>>> +++
>>>>  linuxboot/signrom    |binary
>>>>  linuxboot/signrom.c  |  128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 
>>>> +++++++++++++
>>>>  linuxboot/util.h     |   69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>  qemu/Makefile        |    3 -
>>>>  qemu/Makefile.target |    2
>>>>  qemu/hw/linuxboot.c  |   39 +++++++++++++++
>>>>  qemu/hw/pc.c         |   22 +++++++-
>>>>  qemu/hw/pc.h         |    5 +
>>>>  13 files changed, 600 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list
kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel

Reply via email to