Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 04:56:10PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
>> Andrea Arcangeli a écrit :
>>
>>> +
>>> +static int mm_lock_cmp(const void *a, const void *b)
>>> +{
>>> + cond_resched();
>>> + if ((unsigned long)*(spinlock_t **)a <
>>> + (unsigned long)*(spinlock_t **)b)
>>> + return -1;
>>> + else if (a == b)
>>> + return 0;
>>> + else
>>> + return 1;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>
>> This compare function looks unusual...
>> It should work, but sort() could be faster if the
>> if (a == b) test had a chance to be true eventually...
>>
>
> Hmm, are you saying my mm_lock_cmp won't return 0 if a==b?
>
>
You need to compare *a to *b (at least, that's what you're doing for the
< case).
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100.
Use priority code J8TL2D2.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
