Avi Kivity wrote: > Anthony Liguori wrote: >> >> The ne2k is pretty mmio heavy. You should be able to observe a boost >> with something like iperf (guest=>host) I would think if this is a >> real savings. >> > > If we're just improving ne2k, the complexity isn't worth it. We have > two better nics which are widely supported in guests.
Sure, but the ne2k should be pretty close to an optimal synthetic benchmark for batching. If we don't see a big improvement with it, we're probably not going to see a big improvement with it for anything. As you point out though, the converse isn't necessarily true. Regards, Anthony Liguori ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
