On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 06:50:22PM +0200, Jan Luebbe wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> I'm preparing kvm-67 for debian. While testing i noticed a problem:
> 
> When booting the debian installer from the official CD [1] this problem:
> 
> CPU: L1 I cache: 32K, L1 D cache: 32K
> CPU: L2 cache: 2048K
> Compat vDSO mapped to ffffe000.
> CPU: Intel QEMU Virtual CPU version 0.9.1 stepping 03
> Checking 'hlt' instruction... OK.
> ACPI: Core revision 20060707
> invalid opcode: 0000 [#1]
> Modules linked in:
> CPU:    0                           
> EIP:    0060:[<c01467be>]    Not tainted VLI
> EFLAGS: 00010202   (2.6.18-6-486 #1)
> EIP is at kmem_cache_zalloc+0x2a/0x53
> eax: 0000000a   ebx: c7fe75c0   ecx: c7fe9e00   edx: 000000d0
> esi: c02c50c0   edi: 00000202   ebp: c036bd20   esp: c030ff80
> ds: 007b   es: 007b   ss: 0068    
> Process swapper (pid: 0, ti=c030e000 task=c02bd7a0 task.ti=c030e000)
> Stack: 00000004 c028f968 c029c49a c0146d5b 00000004 00000000 00000014
> c029c499
>        00000046 c030ffc4 00000046 00000046 00000000 00000000 00039100
> c0302800
>        003a7007 c01c7e90 00000000 00000000 00000000 c01db3b5 c0378ce8
> c01dcf07
> Call Trace:                     
>  [<c0146d5b>] kmem_cache_create+0x15e/0x410
>  [<c01c7e90>] acpi_os_create_cache+0x10/0x1c
>  [<c01db3b5>] acpi_ut_create_caches+0x19/0x93
>  [<c01dcf07>] acpi_ut_init_globals+0x5/0x1de
>  [<c01dc5d1>] acpi_initialize_subsystem+0x1b/0x56
>  [<c0323a73>] acpi_early_init+0x45/0xfe
>  [<c03105f5>] start_kernel+0x26b/0x272
> Code: c3 57 56 53 89 c6 9c 5f fa 8b 08 83 39 00 74 12 c7 41 0c 01 00 00
> 00 8b 01
>  48 89 01 8b 5c 81 10 eb 07 e8 a5 fb ff ff 89 c3 57 9d <0f> 0d 0b 90 85
> db 74 1b
>  8b 56 10 31 c0 89 d1 c1 e9 02 89 df f3
> EIP: [<c01467be>] kmem_cache_zalloc+0x2a/0x53 SS:ESP 0068:c030ff80
>  <0>Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill the idle task!

I tried to reproduce this on an AMD system with no success. But when
looking into the code of kmem_cache_zalloc this looks like a guest state
corruption. The guest disables interrupts and the hypervisor reenables
them which triggers the BUG() macro. Maybe kvmtrace can give a hint
which intercept causes this.

Joerg


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list
kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel

Reply via email to