Hi, looks like we are getting better and better here in hitting yet unsupported corner-case features of KVM :). This time our guest fiddles with hardware debugging registers, but quickly gets unhappy as they do not yet have the expected effect.
Joerg, I found you SVM-related patch series in the archive which does not seem to have raised much responses. Is this general direction OK? Does it allow self-debugging of guests? But how are conflicts resolved if both guest and host need the physical registers (host debugging the guest which is debugging itself)? I would try to dig into the VMX side if the general architecture is -mostly- clear. [ Sorry, Joerg, someone put the latter type of HW on my desk :->. Hope I can once check our stuff against SVM as well! ] Thanks, Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT SE 2 Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
