Daniel P. Berrange wrote: >> I guess using file locking by default would improve the situation, and >> we can add a -drive ...,exclusive=no option for people playing with >> cluster filesystems. >> > > Turning on file locking by default will break existing apps / deployments > using shared disks. IMHO this is a policy decision that should be solved > at ahigher level in the management stack where a whole world view is > available rather than QEMU which only knows about its own VM & host. >
Running a newer qemu with an older libvirt would pose a problem, yes. But we shouldn't ignore unmanaged deployments. -- I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this signature is too narrow to contain. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
