Hollis Blanchard wrote: > Avi, please apply these patches to the kvm-userspace repository. I've > submitted > the device emulation patches (UIC and PCI) to qemu-devel, but have received no > response. > >
Applied all, thanks. > Thinking ahead to qemu integration, many of these should be folded into a > single "Bamboo board" patch, but e.g. the device emulation patches are > logically separate. Do you track qemu patches for upstream integration like > you do for the kernel? Do you want me to keep these split-out patches locally? > Unsplitting them later would be a pain... > It's better to keep the patches split. As you point out, folding patches together is easy but splitting them later is hard. I don't keep a qemu patch queue; whether to take patches from kvm-userspace.git or rediff against upstream qemu is a decision that is best taken on a case-by-case basis, if and when qemu upstream becomes receptive to these patches. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
