Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 12:28:32PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote: > >> Applied, thanks. Dynamic allocation for the fpu state was introduced in >> 2.6.26-rc, right? >> > > It seems very recent, hit mainline on 30 Apr. > > Also we may want to think if there's something cheaper than fx_save to > trigger a math exception that doesn't alter the fpu state, I didn't > think much about it given it's such a slow path that's probably not > worth changing with something more complicated anyway. And bringing in > a few l1 exclusive cachelines in the cpu should allow the second > instruction to repeat faster than the first. >
Oh, it's hardly performance critical. I think it is fine as is. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
