On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 8:27 AM, Pekka Enberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You might want to read carefully what Linus wrote: > > > The one that already has a 4 byte padding thing on x86-64 just after the > > spinlock? And that on 32-bit x86 (with less than 256 CPU's) would have two > > bytes of padding if we didn't just make the spinlock type unconditionally > > 32 bits rather than the 16 bits we actually _use_? > > So you need to add the flag _after_ ->lock and _before_ ->head....
Oh should have taken my morning coffee first, before ->lock works obviously as well. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
