Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>> diff --git a/qemu/qemu-kvm-ia64.c b/qemu/qemu-kvm-ia64.c
>> index 4d0ddd7..d227d22 100644
>> --- a/qemu/qemu-kvm-ia64.c
>> +++ b/qemu/qemu-kvm-ia64.c
>> @@ -61,3 +61,7 @@ int kvm_arch_try_push_interrupts(void *opaque)
>> void kvm_arch_update_regs_for_sipi(CPUState *env)
>> {
>> }
>> +
>> +void kvm_arch_cpu_reset(CPUState *env)
>> +{
>> +}
>> diff --git a/qemu/qemu-kvm-powerpc.c b/qemu/qemu-kvm-powerpc.c
>> index 14ed945..024b18c 100644
>> --- a/qemu/qemu-kvm-powerpc.c
>> +++ b/qemu/qemu-kvm-powerpc.c
>> @@ -213,3 +213,7 @@ int handle_powerpc_dcr_write(int vcpu, uint32_t dcrn,
>> uint32_t data)
>>
>> return 0; /* XXX ignore failed DCR ops */
>> }
>> +
>> +void kvm_arch_cpu_reset(CPUState *env)
>> +{
>> +}
>> diff --git a/qemu/qemu-kvm-x86.c b/qemu/qemu-kvm-x86.c
>> index 9a771ff..28eb5c2 100644
>> --- a/qemu/qemu-kvm-x86.c
>> +++ b/qemu/qemu-kvm-x86.c
>> @@ -689,3 +689,19 @@ int handle_tpr_access(void *opaque, int vcpu,
>> kvm_tpr_access_report(cpu_single_env, rip, is_write);
>> return 0;
>> }
>> +
>> +void kvm_arch_cpu_reset(CPUState *env)
>> +{
>> + struct kvm_mp_state mp_state = { .mp_state = KVM_MP_STATE_UNINITIALIZED
>> };
>> +
>> + kvm_arch_load_regs(env);
>> + if (env->cpu_index != 0) {
>> + if (kvm_irqchip_in_kernel(kvm_context))
>> + kvm_set_mpstate(kvm_context, env->cpu_index, &mp_state);
>> + else {
>> + env->interrupt_request &= ~CPU_INTERRUPT_HARD;
>> + env->hflags |= HF_HALTED_MASK;
>> + env->exception_index = EXCP_HLT;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +}
>> diff --git a/qemu/qemu-kvm.c b/qemu/qemu-kvm.c
>> index 3cc6d8e..1e1f065 100644
>> --- a/qemu/qemu-kvm.c
>> +++ b/qemu/qemu-kvm.c
>> @@ -31,8 +31,6 @@ kvm_context_t kvm_context;
>>
>> extern int smp_cpus;
>>
>> -static int qemu_kvm_reset_requested;
>> -
>> pthread_mutex_t qemu_mutex = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER;
>> pthread_cond_t qemu_aio_cond = PTHREAD_COND_INITIALIZER;
>> pthread_cond_t qemu_vcpu_cond = PTHREAD_COND_INITIALIZER;
>> @@ -52,7 +50,6 @@ struct vcpu_info {
>> int signalled;
>> int stop;
>> int stopped;
>> - int reload_regs;
>> int created;
>> } vcpu_info[256];
>>
>> @@ -242,21 +239,29 @@ static void pause_all_threads(void)
>> {
>> int i;
>>
>> + if (cpu_single_env) {
>> + fprintf(stderr, "qemu-kvm: pause_all_threads from vcpu context\n");
>> + exit(0);
>> + }
>> +
>> for (i = 0; i < smp_cpus; ++i) {
>> vcpu_info[i].stop = 1;
>> pthread_kill(vcpu_info[i].thread, SIG_IPI);
>> }
>> - while (!all_threads_paused()) {
>> - CPUState *env = cpu_single_env;
>> + while (!all_threads_paused())
>> pthread_cond_wait(&qemu_pause_cond, &qemu_mutex);
>> - cpu_single_env = env;
>> - }
>> + cpu_single_env = NULL;
>> }
>>
>
> Personally, I prefer it the old way. All of the open-coded
> cpu_single_env's are tough to understand and I believe error-prone. I
> think a strategy of explicitly preserving cpu_single_env whenever we
> drop qemu_mutex is more robust. Explicitly setting cpu_single_env =
> NULL happens to work because this is only called from the io thread.
> It's less clear to a casual reader why it's necessary.
>
> In fact, I'd be much more inclined to see a wrapper around
> pthread_cond_wait() so that we never explicitly had to set cpu_single_env.
You mean something like this?
(Hunks may have some offsets, the patch is from the middle of my queue.)
Marcelo, I'm fine with your approach. I even switched my
vm_stop-on-breakpoint patch to this pattern, and it seems to work
nicely. Will roll out an updated series later (but probably not today -
weather is too fine here 8)).
---
qemu/qemu-kvm.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
Index: b/qemu/qemu-kvm.c
===================================================================
--- a/qemu/qemu-kvm.c
+++ b/qemu/qemu-kvm.c
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ int kvm_allowed = 1;
int kvm_irqchip = 1;
int kvm_pit = 1;
+#include <assert.h>
#include <string.h>
#include "hw/hw.h"
#include "sysemu.h"
@@ -65,6 +66,14 @@ static inline unsigned long kvm_get_thre
return syscall(SYS_gettid);
}
+static void qemu_cond_wait(pthread_cond_t *cond)
+{
+ CPUState *env = cpu_single_env;
+
+ pthread_cond_wait(cond, &qemu_mutex);
+ cpu_single_env = env;
+}
+
CPUState *qemu_kvm_cpu_env(int index)
{
return vcpu_info[index].env;
@@ -247,21 +256,22 @@ static void pause_all_threads(void)
{
int i;
+ assert(!cpu_single_env);
+
for (i = 0; i < smp_cpus; ++i) {
vcpu_info[i].stop = 1;
pthread_kill(vcpu_info[i].thread, SIG_IPI);
}
- while (!all_threads_paused()) {
- CPUState *env = cpu_single_env;
- pthread_cond_wait(&qemu_pause_cond, &qemu_mutex);
- cpu_single_env = env;
- }
+ while (!all_threads_paused())
+ qemu_cond_wait(&qemu_pause_cond);
}
static void resume_all_threads(void)
{
int i;
+ assert(!cpu_single_env);
+
for (i = 0; i < smp_cpus; ++i) {
vcpu_info[i].stop = 0;
vcpu_info[i].stopped = 0;
@@ -380,7 +390,7 @@ static void *ap_main_loop(void *_env)
/* and wait for machine initialization */
while (!qemu_system_ready)
- pthread_cond_wait(&qemu_system_cond, &qemu_mutex);
+ qemu_cond_wait(&qemu_system_cond);
pthread_mutex_unlock(&qemu_mutex);
kvm_main_loop_cpu(env);
@@ -392,7 +402,7 @@ void kvm_init_new_ap(int cpu, CPUState *
pthread_create(&vcpu_info[cpu].thread, NULL, ap_main_loop, env);
while (vcpu_info[cpu].created == 0)
- pthread_cond_wait(&qemu_vcpu_cond, &qemu_mutex);
+ qemu_cond_wait(&qemu_vcpu_cond);
}
int kvm_init_ap(void)
@@ -901,8 +911,6 @@ void qemu_kvm_aio_wait_start(void)
void qemu_kvm_aio_wait(void)
{
- CPUState *cpu_single = cpu_single_env;
-
if (!cpu_single_env) {
if (io_thread_sigfd != -1) {
fd_set rfds;
@@ -919,10 +927,8 @@ void qemu_kvm_aio_wait(void)
sigfd_handler((void *)(unsigned long)io_thread_sigfd);
}
qemu_aio_poll();
- } else {
- pthread_cond_wait(&qemu_aio_cond, &qemu_mutex);
- cpu_single_env = cpu_single;
- }
+ } else
+ qemu_cond_wait(&qemu_aio_cond);
}
void qemu_kvm_aio_wait_end(void)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100.
Use priority code J8TL2D2.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
