On 06.03.2013, at 15:12, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 06/03/2013 15:03, Alexander Graf ha scritto:
>> KVM_IRQ_LINE is basically an IOAPIC interrupt line assert. That's
>> fine. That ioctl should get an ioapic device handle to work on.
>
> It would be a KVM_SET_DEVICE_ATTR in your case, right?
No, it would be KVM_IRQ_LINE. It's basically a command ("do this interrupt"),
not an attribute modification. Unless we want to implement the IRQ pin levels
on the "IOAPIC" as attributes. Then it'd be a SET_DEVICE_ATTR. But that makes
edge interrupt injection harder / less obvious ;).
Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm-ppc" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
