> -----Original Message-----
> From: kvm-ppc-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:kvm-ppc-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On
> Behalf Of Scott Wood
> Sent: Friday, May 10, 2013 8:40 AM
> To: Alexander Graf; Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> Cc: kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org; k...@vger.kernel.org;
> linuxppc-...@lists.ozlabs.org;
> Wood Scott-B07421
> Subject: [PATCH v2 4/4] kvm/ppc: IRQ disabling cleanup
>
> Simplify the handling of lazy EE by going directly from fully-enabled
> to hard-disabled. This replaces the lazy_irq_pending() check
> (including its misplaced kvm_guest_exit() call).
>
> As suggested by Tiejun Chen, move the interrupt disabling into
> kvmppc_prepare_to_enter() rather than have each caller do it. Also
> move the IRQ enabling on heavyweight exit into
> kvmppc_prepare_to_enter().
>
> Don't move kvmppc_fix_ee_before_entry() into kvmppc_prepare_to_enter(),
> so that the caller can avoid marking interrupts enabled earlier than
> necessary (e.g. book3s_pr waits until after FP save/restore is done).
>
> Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottw...@freescale.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h | 6 ++++++
> arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_pr.c | 12 +++---------
> arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c | 9 ++-------
> arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c | 21 ++++++++-------------
> 4 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h
> b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h
> index 6885846..e4474f8 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h
> @@ -404,6 +404,12 @@ static inline void kvmppc_fix_ee_before_entry(void)
> trace_hardirqs_on();
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
> + /*
> + * To avoid races, the caller must have gone directly from having
> + * interrupts fully-enabled to hard-disabled.
> + */
> + WARN_ON(local_paca->irq_happened != PACA_IRQ_HARD_DIS);
> +
> /* Only need to enable IRQs by hard enabling them after this */
> local_paca->irq_happened = 0;
> local_paca->soft_enabled = 1;
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_pr.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_pr.c
> index 0b97ce4..e61e39e 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_pr.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_pr.c
> @@ -884,14 +884,11 @@ program_interrupt:
> * and if we really did time things so badly, then we just exit
> * again due to a host external interrupt.
> */
> - local_irq_disable();
> s = kvmppc_prepare_to_enter(vcpu);
> - if (s <= 0) {
> - local_irq_enable();
> + if (s <= 0)
> r = s;
> - } else {
> + else
> kvmppc_fix_ee_before_entry();
> - }
> }
>
> trace_kvm_book3s_reenter(r, vcpu);
> @@ -1121,12 +1118,9 @@ int kvmppc_vcpu_run(struct kvm_run *kvm_run, struct
> kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> * really did time things so badly, then we just exit again due to
> * a host external interrupt.
> */
> - local_irq_disable();
> ret = kvmppc_prepare_to_enter(vcpu);
> - if (ret <= 0) {
> - local_irq_enable();
> + if (ret <= 0)
> goto out;
> - }
>
> /* Save FPU state in stack */
> if (current->thread.regs->msr & MSR_FP)
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c
> index eb89b83..f7c0111 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c
> @@ -666,10 +666,8 @@ int kvmppc_vcpu_run(struct kvm_run *kvm_run, struct
> kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - local_irq_disable();
> s = kvmppc_prepare_to_enter(vcpu);
> if (s <= 0) {
> - local_irq_enable();
> ret = s;
> goto out;
> }
> @@ -1148,14 +1146,11 @@ int kvmppc_handle_exit(struct kvm_run *run, struct
> kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> * aren't already exiting to userspace for some other reason.
> */
> if (!(r & RESUME_HOST)) {
> - local_irq_disable();
Ok, Now we do not soft disable before kvmppc_prapare_to_enter().
> s = kvmppc_prepare_to_enter(vcpu);
> - if (s <= 0) {
> - local_irq_enable();
> + if (s <= 0)
> r = (s << 2) | RESUME_HOST | (r & RESUME_FLAG_NV);
> - } else {
> + else
> kvmppc_fix_ee_before_entry();
> - }
> }
>
> return r;
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
> index 4e05f8c..f8659aa 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
> @@ -64,12 +64,14 @@ int kvmppc_prepare_to_enter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> int r = 1;
>
> - WARN_ON_ONCE(!irqs_disabled());
> + WARN_ON(irqs_disabled());
> + hard_irq_disable();
Here we hard disable in kvmppc_prepare_to_enter(), so my comment in other patch
about interrupt loss is no more valid.
So here
MSR.EE = 0
local_paca->soft_enabled = 0
local_paca->irq_happened |= PACA_IRQ_HARD_DIS;
> +
> while (true) {
> if (need_resched()) {
> local_irq_enable();
This will make the state:
MSR.EE = 1
local_paca->soft_enabled = 1
local_paca->irq_happened = PACA_IRQ_HARD_DIS; //same as before
Is that a valid state where interrupts are fully enabled and irq_happend in not
0?
> cond_resched();
> - local_irq_disable();
> + hard_irq_disable();
> continue;
> }
>
> @@ -95,7 +97,7 @@ int kvmppc_prepare_to_enter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> local_irq_enable();
> trace_kvm_check_requests(vcpu);
> r = kvmppc_core_check_requests(vcpu);
> - local_irq_disable();
> + hard_irq_disable();
> if (r > 0)
> continue;
> break;
> @@ -108,21 +110,14 @@ int kvmppc_prepare_to_enter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
> - /* lazy EE magic */
> - hard_irq_disable();
> - if (lazy_irq_pending()) {
> - /* Got an interrupt in between, try again */
> - local_irq_enable();
> - local_irq_disable();
> - kvm_guest_exit();
> - continue;
> - }
> + WARN_ON(lazy_irq_pending());
> #endif
>
> kvm_guest_enter();
> - break;
> + return r;
> }
>
> + local_irq_enable();
> return r;
> }
int kvmppc_core_prepare_to_enter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
int r = 0;
WARN_ON_ONCE(!irqs_disabled());
kvmppc_core_check_exceptions(vcpu);
if (vcpu->requests) {
/* Exception delivery raised request; start over */
return 1;
}
if (vcpu->arch.shared->msr & MSR_WE) {
local_irq_enable();
kvm_vcpu_block(vcpu);
clear_bit(KVM_REQ_UNHALT, &vcpu->requests);
local_irq_disable();
^^^
We do not require hard_irq_disable() here?
-Bharat
> #endif /* CONFIG_KVM_BOOK3S_64_HV */
> --
> 1.7.10.4
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm-ppc" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm-ppc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
